Petition and comments

6060 people have signed the petition

The Don't Destroy Research petition is now closed, many thanks to everyone who signed it. Below is the list of signatories and their comments. You can also see a collection of public support for the Rothamsted researchers' appeal here.

The planned direct action against the GM wheat experiment at Rothamsted did not happen on Sunday 27th May. The GM wheat trial is ongoing.



Signatures

Ursula Roß-Stitt, PR Officer

Danny Mollerup Sørensen, Academic researcher
Vandalism of ethically and morally sound scientific experiments equals attacks on free speech... stop this now!

V. Truniger, Tenured Scientist

Andy Robertson, PhD Student

Giuseppe Mandolino, Researcher

Silvana Bononcini, pensionata
firmo e plaudo a questa iniziativa!

Marina Tucci, geneticist

B. Maçãs, wheat breeder

Annelies Haegeman, researcher

Lena, Academic researcher

Nuria Alburquerque, Researcher

Anna Harris, PhD Student

Chris Saunders, Management Consultant

MCA, Consultant
A very important and worthy petition.

Mette Lange, Researcher
please listen to the scientists, esperiments need to be done

Dimitar Djilianov, scientist, plant abiotic stress tolerance
Stop ECOVANDALISM! It is quite a time to stop begging them not to disturb our work! Let them know that we work for public benefit only! The Government should have a clear position about this, too!

Merete Albrechtsen, Associate professor
Prudent use of GMOs can help the environment and should be supported by environmentalists, not attacked

Peter Langridge, Academic
Vandalism of scientific experiments is an attack on science and inquiry.

Matthew, Biologist
We need to continously improve farming methods and genetics to support our global growing population - biotechnology provide us with tools to do so.

David Evans, agro-chemical consultant
Sadly Europe seems not to understand that there is a key future for GM crops to feed ourselves and the world. USA, China, India etc do recognise the potential. USA over many years of use has shown the regulation of the technology is competent to assess the risks.

« previous   1   10   20   30   40   50   60   70   80   90   100   110   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   140   150   160   170   180   190   200   210   220   230   240   250   260   270   280   290   300   next »


Latest tweets from: @senseaboutsci

  • Gosh, the Chinese translation of our I Don't Know What to Believe guide had 2.5 million hits in 3 weeks! http://t.co/N683mTrx7x … 1 day ago

  • European consumer group @BEUCtweet tells us why consumers should urge MEPs to support openness in clinical trials http://t.co/IdlxLrCaAA 1 day ago

  • Just great. Major European consumer group has now joined #AllTrials ahead of next week’s vote on clinical trial regulations! @BEUCtweet 1 day ago